A pilot study of corporate governance and accounting fraud: The fraud diamond model
Article Metrics Report
Views, downloads, citations, engagementCited by
Current citation countResearch summary
This research aimed to analyze the risk factor of fraud diamond model towards accounting fraud and corporate governance as a moderating variable in relation with risk factor in fraud diamond model towards accounting fraud. This research using 12 fraud companies and 32 non-fraud companies listed by Indonesia stock exchange that breaking the article VIII.G.7issued by Financial Services Authority. With using logistic regression, the research result shows that only change in direction that is affect significantly towards accounting fraud. The next result, it shows that board of commissioners, independent commissioners and institution ownershipbe able to weaken the relation of change in direction towards accounting fraud. This research can suggest to the investors to be more careful in investing their fund. Especially, in the company that carries out the higher change in direction, because it tends to have accounting frauds. Furthermore, the company can improve the board of commissioners, independent commissioners and iinstitution ownershipp, so that the level of accounting fraud can be lowered.
Article History
How to Cite
Pamungkas, I. D., Ghozali, I., & Achmad, T.. (2018). A pilot study of corporate governance and accounting fraud: The fraud diamond model. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 12 Issue 2.
Citation Context
APA
Pamungkas, I. D., Ghozali, I., & Achmad, T.. (2018). A pilot study of corporate governance and accounting fraud: The fraud diamond model. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 12 Issue 2.
MLA
Pamungkas, Imang Dapit, et al.. "A pilot study of corporate governance and accounting fraud: The fraud diamond model." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 12 Issue 2, 2018.
Chicago
Imang Dapit Pamungkas, Imam Ghozali, and Tarmizi Achmad. "A pilot study of corporate governance and accounting fraud: The fraud diamond model." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research Volume 12 Issue 2 (20 Jan 2018).
Harvard
Pamungkas, I. D., Ghozali, I., & Achmad, T. (2018) A pilot study of corporate governance and accounting fraud: The fraud diamond model. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 12 Issue 2
References
- Albrecht, W. S., & Albrecht, C. C. (2002). Root out financial deception. Journal of Accountancy, 193(4), 30.
- Andayani, T. D. (2010). Pengaruh Karakteristik Dewan Komisaris Independen terhadap Manajemen Laba (Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Universitas Diponegoro.
- Ansar, M. (2012). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Publik Di Indonesia. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
- Antonia, E. (2008). Analisis Pengaruh Reputasi Auditor, Proporsi Dewan Komisaris Independen, Leverage, Kepemilikan Manajerial dan Proporsi Komite Audit Independen terhadap Manajemen Laba (Studi pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2004–2006). program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro.
- Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, F., & Zimmermann, H. (2004). Is board size an independent corporate governance mechanism? Kyklos, 57(3), 327–356.
- Brennan, N., & Kelly, J. (2007). A study of whistleblowing among trainee auditors. The British Accounting Review, 39(1), 61–87.
- Chen, K. Y., & Elder, R. J. (2007). Fraud risk factors and the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting: Evidence from statement on Auditing Standards No. 43 in Taiwan. Syracuse University Whitman School of Management Syracuse.
- Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., Saunders, A., & Tehranian, H. (2007). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(6), 1771–1794.
- Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1–36.
- Dunn, P. (2004). The impact of insider power on fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Management, 30(3), 397–412.
- Fimanaya, F., & Syafruddin, M. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Non Keuangan Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2008-2011). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(3), 1–11.
- Ghozali, I. (2006). Applications Multivariate Analysis with SPSS Program. Semarang: Publisher Agency Diponegoro University.
- Governance, K. N. K. C. (2004). Pedoman Good Corporate Governance Perbankan Indonesia. Bank Indonesia.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
- Kasmir. (2013). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. In Rajawali Pers (Edisi 1, p. 202). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
- Lim, S., Matolcsy, Z., & Chow, D. (2007). The association between board composition and different types of voluntary disclosure. European Accounting Review, 16(3), 555–583.
- Loebbecke, J. K., Eining, M. M., & Willingham, J. J. (1989). Auditors experience with material irregularities-frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(1), 1–28.
- Lou, Y., & Wang, M. (2009). Fraud Risk Factor Of The Fraud Triangle Assessing The Likelihood Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 7(2), 61–78.
- Marrakchi Chtourou, S., Bedard, J., & Courteau, L. (2001). Corporate governance and earnings management.
- Puspatrisnanti, T. (2014). Analisis Hubungan Manajemen Laba Dan Fraud Dalam Laporan Keuangan. Proceeding SNA, 16.
- Rahmanti, M. M., & Daljono, D. (2013). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Faktor Risiko Tekanan dan Peluang (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan yang Mendapat Sanksi dari Bapepam Periode 2002–2006). Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis.
- Ratmono, D., Avrie, D. Y., & Purwanto, A. (2014). Dapatkah Teori Fraud Triangle Menjelaskan Kecurangan dalam Laporan Keuangan? Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, (17).
- Sihombing, K. S., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Analisis Fraud Diamond dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud: Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2010-2012. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis.
- Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting And Predicting Financial Statement Fraud : The Effectiveness Of The Fraud Triangle And SAS NO . 99. Advances in Financial Economics, 13(99), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005
- Stice, J. D. (1991). Using financial and market information to identify pre-engagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. Accounting Review, 516–533.
- Sukirman, S., & Sari, M. P. (2013). Model Deteksi Kecurangan Berbasis Fraud Triangle. JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN AUDITING, 9(2), 199–225.
- Syakhroza, A. (2005). Corporate Governance, Sejarah, & Perkembangan Teori. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
- Tangjitprom, N. (2013). The role of corporate governance in reducing the negative effect of earnings management.
- Tuanakotta, T. M. (2007). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
- Ujiyantho, M. A., & Pramuka, B. A. (2007). Mekanisme Corporate Governance, Manajemen Laba dan Kinerja Keuangan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X, 26–28.
- Widyastuti, T. (2009). Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan dan kinerja keuangan terhadap manajemen laba: Studi pada perusahaan manufaktur di BEJ. MAKSI, 9.
- Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38.