JBRMR
Online ISSN 2056-6271 ICO Registration Number: ZA522255
Accepting submissions

Article Details

Volume 12 Issue 3

Comparative advantages of Kazakhstan assessed by the Balassa Index: consistently competitive exports are limited to raw materials with low added value

Published: 20 Apr 2018 Issue:Volume 12 Issue 3 Apr 2018 Author details below

Diana Madiyarova

L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University Department of Economics

Ainur Amirbekova

L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University Department of Economics

Marat Syrlybayev

L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University Department of Economics

Download PDF Reading View How to Cite BibTeX / RIS XML Metadata JSON Metadata View Issue
Share

Article Metrics Report

Views, downloads, citations, engagement

Cited by

Current citation count

Research summary

          The aim of this study is to determine the competitive advantages of Kazakhstan in trading with other countries based on revealed comparative advantages, in which the interlinked commodity exchanges will be developed in the medium-term. This research applies the index of comparative advantages. The paper presents an empirical analysis of the competitive advantages of Kazakhstan export products. The Balassa Index was proposed for Kazakh six-digit HS product category level, the choice of which was due to their modest design of calculation and simplicity in interpreting the results.
          The main results reveal that Kazakhstan shows a comparative advantage in a number of sectors; the product groups with a strong competitive advantage show a significant variation in comparative advantage. The results can be applied to assess Kazakhstan’s export competitiveness and the restructuring of its domestic trade policy.

Article History

Published 20 Apr 2018

How to Cite

Madiyarova, D., Amirbekova, A., & Syrlybayev, M.. (2018). Comparative advantages of Kazakhstan assessed by the Balassa Index: consistently competitive exports are limited to raw materials with low added value. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 12 Issue 3.

Citation Context

Archive cited by No internal citing article yet
Reference depth 31 sources listed
DOI record DOI not listed
Citation signal 4 recorded citations

APA

Madiyarova, D., Amirbekova, A., & Syrlybayev, M.. (2018). Comparative advantages of Kazakhstan assessed by the Balassa Index: consistently competitive exports are limited to raw materials with low added value. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 12 Issue 3.

MLA

Madiyarova, Diana, et al.. "Comparative advantages of Kazakhstan assessed by the Balassa Index: consistently competitive exports are limited to raw materials with low added value." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 12 Issue 3, 2018.

Chicago

Diana Madiyarova, Ainur Amirbekova, and Marat Syrlybayev. "Comparative advantages of Kazakhstan assessed by the Balassa Index: consistently competitive exports are limited to raw materials with low added value." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research Volume 12 Issue 3 (20 Apr 2018).

Harvard

Madiyarova, D., Amirbekova, A., & Syrlybayev, M. (2018) Comparative advantages of Kazakhstan assessed by the Balassa Index: consistently competitive exports are limited to raw materials with low added value. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 12 Issue 3

References

  1. Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations: A modern-day interpretation of an economic classic. Karen McCreadie, 2009, Infinite Ideas, Oxford, UK; ISBN 978-1-906821-03-6
  2. Bezic, H. et al. (2011).  Changes in the competitive advantages of Croatia’s manufacturing industry, Heri Bezić, Ljerka Cerović, Tomislav Galović. Changes in the competitive advantages... Zb. rad. Ekon. fak. Rij. vol. 29, sv. 2, pp. 465-487.
  3. Bhattacharyya, R. (2011). Revealed comparative advantage and competitiveness: a case study for India in horticultural products. International conference on applied economics. – ICOAE.
  4. Bojnec, S. (2001). Trade and Revealed Comparative Advantage Measures: Regional and Central and East European Agricultural Trade. Eastern European Economics. Volume 39, Issue 2.
  5. Bojnec, S. and Ferto, I. (2014a). Export competitiveness of dairy products on global markets: The case of the European Union countries. Journal of Dairy Science, 97, 10, pp.6151–6163.
  6. Bojnec, S. and Ferto, I. (2014b). Forestry industry trade by degree of wood processing in the enlarged European Union countries, Forest Policy and Economics 40, pp.31–39.
  7. Bruneckiene, J. and Paltanaviciene, D. (2012). Measurement of Export Competitiveness of the Baltic States by Composite Index. English Economics, 23, 1, pp. 50–62.
  8. Chamberlin, E. (1933). Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. De Benedictis, L. and Tamberi, M. (2004). Overall specialization empirics: techniques and applications. Open Econ. Rev. 15 (4), pp.323–346.
  10. Dornbusch, R. et al. (1977). Comparative Advantage, Trade and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods, American Economic Review, 67, No. 5, December, pp.823-839.
  11. Ferto, I. and Hubbard, L. (2003). Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness in Hungarian Agri-Food Sectors. The World Economy, 26, 2, pp.247-259.
  12. Greenaway, D. and Milner, C. (1993). Trade and Industrial Policy in Developing Countries: A Manual of Policy Analysis. The Macmillan Press, esp. Part IV Evaluating Comparative Advantage, pp.181-208.
  13. Haque, A. et al. (2014). Export Performance of Malaysian Furniture Industry: Rethinking Competitiveness, Middle East Journal of Business, 9, 1.
  14. Keynes, J. (1937). The General Theory of Employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2), pp.209–223.
  15. Khatibi, A. (2008).  Kazakhstan’s Revealed Comparative Advantage Vis-À-Vis the EU-27, ECIPE Working Paper. No. 03.
  16. Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs (March/April 1994), pp. 28-44.
  17. Kumar, A. (2010). Exports of Livestock Products from India: Performance, Competitiveness and Determinants, Agricultural Research Review, vol. 23, no. June, pp. 57–67. 
  18. Leishman, D., et al. (2013). Revealed comparative advantage and the measurement of international competitiveness for agricultural commodities: an empirical analysis of wool exporters // Western agricultural economics association.  
  19. Liesner, H. (1958). The European Common Market and British Industry. Economic Journal, 68, pp.16-302.
  20. Marconi, D. (2006). Comparative Advantage Patterns and Domestic Determinants in Emerging Countries // Banca d'Italia, Servizio Studi.
  21. Mikulis, J. and Ruzevicius, J. (2011). Management systems and competitiveness of a country–Lithuanian context. Current Issues in Business Law, 3, 0, pp.26–46.
  22. O’Donnell, R. (1997). The Competitive Advantage of Peripheral Regions: Conceptual Issues and Research Approaches. In B. Fynes & S. Ennis (eds), Competing from the Periphery. Core Issues in International Business. The Dryden Press, pp.47–82.
  23. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.
  24. Razumnova, L., Prusova S. (2009). Russia's competitiveness on the global product market and regional market in the BRIC countries // Audit and financial analysis. No. 6, pp. 1-6.
  25. Ricardo, David (1817), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1 ed.), London: John Murray, retrieved 2012-12-07 via Google Books
  26. Schumpeter, J. (1954). History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.
  27. Toming, K., (2007). The Impact of EU Accession on the Export Competitiveness of the Estonian Food Processing Industry, Post-Communist Economies, 19, 2, pp.187-207.
  28. Tyson, L. (1992). Who’s bashing whom? Trade conflicts in High-technology industries.
  29. Utkulu, U. and Seymen D. (2004a). Trade and Competitiveness between Turkey and the EU: Time Series Evidence. Europe in Global World-blending differences, OPEN MINDS Conference, University of Lodz, Lodz-Polond, September.
  30. Utkulu, U., and Seymen, D., (2004b). Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: Evidence for Turkey vis-à-vis the EU/15, European Trade Study Group 6th Annual Conference, ETSG 2004, Nottingham, September.
  31. Vollrath, T. (1991). A Theoretical Evaluation of Alternative Trade Intensity Measures of Revealed, Weltwirtschaftlisches Archive, 127, 2, pp.265–280.

Related Articles

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and consumer purchase intention in the UK fashion industry
The Impact of Innovative Marketing on Competitive Advantage in Renewable Energy Companies in Jordan
The Moderating Effect of Entrepreneurial Leadership and Competitive Advantage on the Relationship Between Business Model Innovation and Startup Performance
Image management and competitive advantage of manufacturing firms in South-East, Nigeria

Browse Articles

AI anxiety and consumer identity: Emotional responses to intelligent systems through the identity-aligned emotional model — quantitative evidence from a mediterranean high -uncertainty-avoidance consumer sample
Impact of heat waves on Spanish tourism demand
Colour and consumer buying behaviour in the UK fashion industry
The impact of the Qatar blockade on customer relationship management
Nexus between sustainable brand equity and behavioural outcomes: The moderating role of age
Understanding the impact of reward and recognition, work life balance, on employee retention with job satisfaction as mediating variable on millennials in Indonesia
Organizational culture and job satisfaction: a study Of organized retail sector
Retail turnover clauses in an online world
How to win back the disgruntled consumer? The omni-channel way
Brand awareness of 'generation y' customers towards doughnut retail outlets in India
AI anxiety and consumer identity: Emotional responses to intelligent systems through the identity-aligned emotional model — quantitative evidence from a mediterranean high -uncertainty-avoidance consumer sample
Impact of heat waves on Spanish tourism demand
Colour and consumer buying behaviour in the UK fashion industry
The impact of the Qatar blockade on customer relationship management
Nexus between sustainable brand equity and behavioural outcomes: The moderating role of age